WebbSee Phillips v Botha (supra) at 11C-H. 38. It is submitted that Respondent has instituted proceedings with the sole purpose of using the law to aggravate and humiliate the accused. This submission is made on two bases. 39. Firstly, Respondent has no prospect of success in this matter. Webb3 Rand Waterraad v Bothma 1997 3 SA 120 (O) (hereafter Rand Waterraad (O)) 130; Trustees, Brian Lackey Trust v Annandale 2004 3 SA 281 (C) (hereafter Brian Lackey Trust (C)) paras 17-31; Phillips v South African National Parks Board 2010 ZAECGHC 27 (hereafter Phillips (ZAECGHC)) para 21. 4 Temmers Building Encroachments 109-111. 5 …
Delport and Others v S (861/13) [2014] ZASCA 197; [2015] 1 All SA …
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAKZPHC/2010/17.pdf WebbPhillips v South African National Parks Board 2010 ZAECGHC 27 . Rand Waterraad v Bothma 1997 3 SA 120 (O) Reflect-All 1025 CC v MEC for Public Transport Roads and Works, Gauteng Provincial Government 2009 6 SA 391 (CC) Roseveare v Katmer, Katmer v Roseveare 2013 ZAGPJHC 18 . finance act 8 of 2020
Pieter Willem Botha – Wikipedia
WebbIn Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 542 (1971) (per curiam), the plaintiff's claim of gender discrimination was based on the fact that the employer refused to accept … WebbPhillips v Phillips [1993] 3 NZLR 159; (1993) 10 FRNZ 110 is a cited court case in New Zealand, where both parties entering into a contract make the same mistake (often … Webb17 nov. 2024 · The Constitutional Court approvingly quoted from the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment in Phillips v Botha, where the court defined an abuse of process as follows: “The term ‘abuse of ... gsi enamelware dishwasher